First year Architectural Drawing
----------------------------------------
The abstraction of real world into technical orthographic drawings is absorbed differently by different students. We began directly with drawing the stool, keeping the tempo of the studio upbeat. Some took up the challenge and coped up quite well, while some struggled and felt intimidated. We realized that it may be a good idea to begin with bare basics.
----------------------------------------
The abstraction of real world into technical orthographic drawings is absorbed differently by different students. We began directly with drawing the stool, keeping the tempo of the studio upbeat. Some took up the challenge and coped up quite well, while some struggled and felt intimidated. We realized that it may be a good idea to begin with bare basics.
A
lot of confusion was assumed by students with terminologies of 'plan', 'section' and 'elevation', 'sectional plan', 'sectional elevation', 'roof plan', and so on. The
idea of 'cut plane' took time for students to understand. That every plan is cut, and thus in
section kept confusing students. This brings us to consider introducing to them
the vocabulary of making architectural drawings and processes more succinctly
and formally.
Many
students come from the “memory drawing” baggage, so it was reasonably easy for
them to sketch the chair quickly. However, techniques of sketching confident
lines was reinforced. Many missed observing the proportions of the chair,
placement of members and taking reference from within the object. Most students
had the tendency to fill up the entire canvas when they captured the object on
paper, leaving no space for making additional notes like dimensions, etc. Also,
most students directly sketch with firm lines, leaving no room for recourse or
correction.
It
became imperative to bring to their attention, composing a drawing on a sheet.
Further, we had to spell out to the students to draw faintly to begin with,
slowly excavating the chair from an imaginary box, as if the chair was packed
in a gift box. The box would establish the overall proportions and facilitate
the referencing of lines. We then pointed to them how relevant construction
sketch lines could finally be made bold.
Most
students drew the plans, sections and elevations with correct line weights
following the demonstration. They goofed up in hatching. Some hand-sketched the
hatch, some made it as bold as the outlines and some made it too fine and close
than actually required. All such drawings were asked to be corrected. Many
students confused with the diagonal section hatch v/s the parallel elevation
hatch. The associations were made clear to them.
Almost
all students drew the isometric transformative drawing confidently. This
happened perhaps because this form was most real to them. The 3-d drawing came
much closer to the way the object actually appeared. There were very few
students who found difficulty in this leg. We dealt with them separately.
The
exploded isometric view created two confusions. First, in which axis to
displace the exploded part. Second, should the displaced part be shown where it
originally belongs. The logic of pulling out cognizable parts did not come
across through their drawings. However, it was an ambitious object and
students’ attempt was worth appraisal.
The
mapping drawing was exploratory. The session where they themselves explored
charcoal, ink and water colours was extremely useful for them to get over the
fear of using these. It helped students in being bold to use these in their
following drawing. Many students learn by copying. References are extremely
helpful to make them learn how to draw trees, people and everyday objects. Many
students attempted reproducing from books like Pen&Ink and were extremely
successful.
One
of the biggest things that came out was that we need to inculcate patience
within students of today. While the early mapping drawings turned out to be
extremely hurried and unpleasant, they improved as students dealt with them
with more care and love, slowing down and drawing each part of it with care.
They enjoyed the drawing as it became beautiful over time, and developed an
association with their work. It was good to see many students sharing the
skills they had polished with others. Some who learnt better human figures drew
in those with need in lieu of other skills like lines, smudges, hatches or
stipplings. Some made folders for everyone who had postcard format drawings in
class. Others helped in stitching multiple sheets neatly. Overall,
it was a compact and tightly handled module.
Following projects by students in order of
Siddharth Chitalia
Ria Das
Aurea D'Cruz
Foram Desai
Krutika Dhelia
Chinmay Gawde
Siddhesh Patil
Pooja Patre
Sanya Ranade
Radhika Rathi
Vibhavari Sarangan
Following projects by students in order of
Siddharth Chitalia
Ria Das
Aurea D'Cruz
Foram Desai
Krutika Dhelia
Chinmay Gawde
Siddhesh Patil
Pooja Patre
Sanya Ranade
Radhika Rathi
Vibhavari Sarangan
No comments:
Post a Comment