Looking at smart people I have started observing what makes
some smart people different than the other? How does one describe the
specificities of different kinds of smart people? The ultimate adjectives,
which seem reasonable measures are the intelligent and the wise.
I am a big fan of the wise instead of the intelligent. How
does one characterize the two? Through my understanding, here are my
distinctions between the two.
Firstly, let me make clear distinction between data and
information. Something purely factual (a first hand reading of any situation)
is data. It concerns with hard reality. We generate information through
collection of data. The study of information creates knowledge. Thus the
intelligent are those who are controlled by and in control of knowledge. The
intelligent work within set knowledge systems and operate through this
understood and accepted system. The intelligent will be able to help you with
all kinds of things that exist in the real world. They talk of facts and their
synthesis. You can trust them on the authenticity of information. Their skill
lies in memorizing and processing the memory to get the right information at
the right time. They work exceptionally well within structured environments.
These are the people made for the cities – they can impress people and make
their way out of situations, through legal and technical knowledge in their
respective fields.
However, the intelligent could make mistakes in
non-structured environments. They are highly susceptible to fall into traps of
incorrect decisions in places where no formal knowledge systems exists. Wading
through such field is the expertise of the wise.
It is yet difficult to define if the wise make their way
through intelligence. Let’s assume that the wise are intelligent by virtue of
their ability to contextualize any kind of data (they do not understand data
through knowledge structures). They operate in the field of information, more
basely, in the field of data, making their own meanings and readings that are
highly contextual to different environments and situations. In this view, the
wise are intelligent not because they can memorize all the data, but due to
their ability to grasp new data for a particular scenario efficiently and
quickly. The wise work with human response and behaviour. In this sense, the
difference between the intelligent and the wise is similar to the nature of
scalars and vectors respectively – while one is, in essence, quantitative, the
other has multiple transforming aspects (like direction, momentum and
acceleration) to it which makes it quantitative in the realm of (in the purview, subset) of qualitative.
The wise are thus able to foresee new knowledge systems /
structures and are able to take tactical decisions. Due to their ability to
contextualize any kind of information, they are always at their toes and are
able to take logical decisions, which bear results for the time being. The wise
may not be able to give long term decisions, they may be able to frame a
decision that is relevant for the immediate action. In long term, thus, the
wise may make mistakes. But also, they may give creative outlooks towards the
future. There is a value to this creativity, this leap that the wise takes for
the future based on the assumptions of the current. The intelligent may be
strategists. They may not conceptualize futures based on current conditions,
but imagine new conditions for the future. In doing so, the intelligent miss
out on a lot of humour and wit. But the intelligence of their decisions can be
harnessed through following their plans.
Another important distinction one can make is the amount of
rationality that the intelligent show versus the wise. The intelligent would
always have a high level of rationality as compared to the wise since they rely
on very safe back up like factual information. The wise use personal logic and
bring in a lot of subjectivity to the interpretation of existing data. Also,
they rely more on personal experience than objective case studies. While the
intelligent would build up a decision based on a range of case studies, the
wise would use personal history to give an output.
This post is under construction. It may continue if more
ideas occur. Meanwhile, suspended.
1 comment:
Wise is wrong word...Wise is something which can be stuck by others on someone...
rather than intelligent and wise...you can call it stupid and mad...practical and pragmatic and so on...
its just being at crossroads for a million of reasons...while one could have been other in a hint...
Post a Comment