Workplaces

This is ridiculous. If institutions start behaving in such irrational way, what should we expect from our to be professionals?
The AOA library installed about 12 new computers in the library and momentarily put a zip on the students voice. The reality is that none of them work, rather are not made functional yet. They are waiting for its "official inauguration". I dont understand what is there to inaugurate in computers, which were supposed to be here long time back. Students are waiting to work and Mr. Important will come some day and inaugurate the silly pcs.

The students fear to write a complaint letter thinking that the management will fire back and take revenge, which might affect their grades. Systems thus become corrupt. In India, they become stale and then stink.

We are crying for additional machines (PCs) to work and the issue has already been postponed for two months now. We have already lost a lot of data in a computer crash.

In our country, the burden of inefficiency in work is put only on the employees. Its normal to hold the employee responsible for slow, or insufficient product. Seldom does anyone take into account the work environment. Such work environments are extremely demoralizing for people who want to work. This mood settles in people and becomes a long term crib.

Half the time is spent in quarreling, writing complaint letters and traveling across hierarchies to reach right people. The verdict is always that you get frustrated and give up. The people who go on extremes of such situations become cynics. The other kind of people are social workers.

I have worked earlier at the Goethe Institute, Mumbai, and I can compare the kind of professionalism in work atmosphere that we have in our scenarios and international ones. Its sad to categorize our context in the negative in this scenario. But India runs like that. There are momentary answers given to shut people's mouths and the solution is just a 'jugaad'. There is not english word for jugaad. Still, people work, people keep up with their jobs - like we do. The employers are shameless, and they dont mind this kind of shame. After all, they believe that they are the people who produce the highest calibre of professionals in the country.

Money drives institutions. Huge amount of money is pocketed. There is no transparency. And unfortunately, it is the facilities that make the institutions run, not the teachers. It is appalling to see the newest of the institutions promote their swimming pools, computer labs, green lawns, wi fi systems and all amenities - NOT one says that we have Good teachers. Parents too judge schools with infrastructure, not teachers. It is not therefore surprising to see that students become demanding of facilities. But my point here is that institutions realize this demand and use it as a marketing gimmick. They extract huge money from entrants, but in the end, do not give facilities to students. What's the point? There have to be ways to fight. There have to be other ways to retaliate, negotiate. I dont know how! Seems the only party in loss is the students and staff. Long live the parasites!

"You look sad..."

I really don't know what went wrong in the past year?

Durer's instrument

Today we did the Durer's Experiment. although i was kind of confident of what result it would produce, it didnot produce really stunning drawings. It was then when Shubhalakshmi told me that Durer too accepted that there were a lot of technical faults in the experiment he did with the grid. I think still, that durer was a lot more technically correct than us. Almost all the students missed the eyehole in their instrument grid they used to draw! So their vision wavered! Some students were concentrating, others were not able to relate to the grid and our object assembly together. But only in a very few drawings, could we actually see converging lines on a cartesian grid.

This was our first theory in practice kind of session where we got a space on a cartesian grid (although people may debate that it would have been even fine to just take any photograph and draw it out on paper). But the point was not that. The point was to perceive a 3D assembly on a flat plane. Hopefully some students will get the point.

I can think of doing a lot of things with this drawing. Sometimes it just gets difficult in communication with students and faculty. Artists think very different from architects. Although they draw in 3D, they think only in 2D. That is what i felt with my colleagues. This is perfectly fine, and I am just wondering how can I use this aspect constructively. We are teaching "perspective drawing" and our definition of perspective is "the way you look" - so you see how broad this subject has become.

We now have to crack some good exercises. Experiments and more fun on the way...

Cycloid

Today, Prof. Deshpande took us to the first year class where he was teaching the students to draw a cycloid.

A cycloid is the locus of a point on the circumference of a moving circle. Fascinating. It immediately reminded me of the steam engine and the Harrappan toys (frogs with elleptical wheels which when run, jump!). The idea was gripping. Just last week, I had also read about Descartes, and how he took numbers to a visual space. So I immediately asked Deshpande sir about how it could be algebraically noted. Since it was not a free curve, its equation is written in terms of theta (the angle of the radius). Complex. I know. But i could immediately relate to what it meant - it meant that the coordinates of the curve would only be polar coordinates. Fancy no! While preparing for my graphics lecture, I clarified my polar and cartesian coordinate concepts (which I had studied in the 12th standard). It would have been so easy if our teachers then could make us understand visually, rather demonstrate us its use. Today I find it: and I can actually link it to structure of a building, geometry, graphics, algebra, cartesian system and ofcourse - design. Which Design: the lovely Kimbell Art Museum by Louis I Kahn in Texas. There are so many aspects to study in this building. Its amazing.

After coming back home, I could not resist trying to draw this out myself. I quickly opened AutoCad, and the first few times, I got it wrong. Then I had to visit Wikipedia, and learn how to draw it. So here I present to you my version of a Cycloid with a radius of 7 units.



















Imagine if the circle was moving on a sine wave! Now that one would require a software. And what if the circle was a sphere! Keep guessing!

Google Gadgets

Today I have been exploring the different gadgets that gmail offers and it's exciting feeling for a while to make yourself a bit tech savvy. I am writing this blogger post from my gmail account and its fascinating to learn that I am not that bad at technology! Now I will not have to switch between pages to keep maintaining my blogs. Sometimes I wonder how people keep doing such things, where life is becoming so simpler. It's just that on the face this process looked difficult. I made a google search as to how I can blog from my gmail account although I used to login from a rediff username, and google was prompt enough to offer me a solution.

So I am now going to hunt for more such gadgets for my gmail interface. People who visit my blog often will be happy to find my postings more often! Many a times I am too lazy to write, but now, it will be like writing an s.m.s. on my small little blog window on gmail.

:)

Mumbai

Bomb Scare

Yesterday, as I reached to the college in the morning, I was informed that there is a bomb threat call in the college, and it had to be vacated.

I was asked by Adarkar Sir to call at helpline 100 and ask for the Dadar Police chowki number. Mr. Ravindra Punde then made a call on my noted down numbers. He spoke in Marathi - “mee Academy of Architecture madhoon bolotye, aamchya college madhye bomb threat cha call aala aahey, me principal aahey”

Police: “chaalel”

RP: “chaalel mhanje kaay?”

Police: “koni kela phone?”

RP: “aata phone karnaara naav sangto kaa?”

I guess now the police is so used to such checkings, that it’s a daily affair for them. We vacated the college in about the next 15 minutes, and the police van had reached by then.

As I stepped outside the college, I saw a horde of students standing in front of the building of Academy of Architecture, as if it is going to be demolished. It was spectacular. As if they were waiting for the bomb to explode.

No one dispersed. No one moved…


Our class was cancelled, but we thought it would be interesting to have an informal chat in the open ground behind. By then, Neera Ma’am suggested that she would talk at the Ravindra Natya Mandir and ask if they could allow us to use their courtyard for holding a discussion/class. (She knew the director of the place, who had retired, but she just took a chance with the security guard, if he allowed). The space was made available to us.

We held our Design studio in the courtyard of Ravindra Natya Mandir. Students sat on the steps and the faculty addressed the class (almost unfazed by the ’bomb scare’). It was as if everything was normal. After all, this was perhaps the 3^rd or 4^th threat call in the college.

Students used the steps and stage to display their work. The space became like mini museum, and the dark brown granite steps gave a nice backdrop to students’ work.

I like this nature of urban space in the city. The immediate availability and the way students adopted to it in an emergency situation was interesting. The space was calm, there was no clutter, we discussed student work, and it wasn’t even a classroom. I also like Neera ma’am’s prompt idea, and she also went to the extent of calling other classes to occupy the courtyard of the Ravindra Natya Mandir. I guess that is the sign of an activist.

On the other hand, spectacles are created in the city so instantly. They die instantly too. Looking at 200 students on an otherwise empty road was spectacular, and I couldnot resist taking a picture. In some time, students will walk off after hearing such warnings so easily that the “threat calls” will become a part of everyday. Or has it become our everyday already?

This was one instance also where I realized that it's not so important to have a campus for the college. Infact the very setting of it allows for multiple kinds of activities, and the multiplicity of spaces available to us also changes the way we behave or adjust to space. It was a break from the mundane classroom setting.   Also I realized that how easy was it to convert the existing space itself into a campus. We just need to make holes in the boundary walls of our adjacent plots. Then we have a cultural centre, a large courtyard, a large open ground, a temple and so many things in our campus. How exciting it would be!

Unfortunately, boundaries have become essential. The reason - just the very threat calls!

Art and Artists

In the past few weeks I have attended works of various artists - Sudhir Patwardhan (painter),Gieve Patel (painter) and Mithu Sen (artist) and Dayanita Singh (photographer)

Sudhir and Gieve have been trained as doctors. Their works have dealt primarlily dealt with the idea of body. Though both are doctors the representation of the body in their work is completely non clinical. In their paintings, the limbs never have the bony structure. Bodies donot have biological details. And both the painters capture very different moments in the city. In one of the paintings, Sudhir freezes an accident on the street, in another, he draws out the memories of Parel fly over and mills, talking about memory, history, pace of life in the city, transformation...Similarly, Gieve seems interested earlier in political figures. He also talks about experiences which can be relived while seeing paintings. One of Gieve's work was a sculpture 'Eklavya' - a bronze hand with a cut thumb. I wonder what the experience of an artist would be (who is actually a doctor) to construct a sculpture without a thumb. Similarly, Gieve's painting in which a group of crows were eating a mouse (or a lizard), where the lizard was cut open, the internal organs of the reptile have been blurred. A doctor would precisely know how things inside the body are placed, and when he chooses not to show them, it definitely is a thought to ponder upon.

On the other hand Mithus work (http://www.mithusen.com/ ) was full of glutton, penises, skeleton and biologically morphed teeth and gums. Her work was very provocative. What she shared in the talk I attended was her difficult past and struggle with drawing in academics at Viswa Bharati, and also her difficulty with language. When she moved to Delhi from Bengal, she had a very strong accent, and also she would teach in a school, where people would make fun of her (and she would feel embarrassed). She took time to come out of this, and to become confident when later she got a scholarship to study in London. Her work explores sexual imagery which embarrasses the viewer and forces them to accept the hard reality of life (suddenly as if the position of the person who is making fun, and the person being made fun of was changed). What I saw in her work was the meticulous detail in the internal of the body - the intestines, the detail of teeth, gums, hair, etc. which talk about female sexuality.

The doctors were on the contrary subtle. I visited the exhibitions and talks with Subulakshmi, and infact her presence helped in raising sevaral of these distinctions. The work of art attains so much more meaning when one knows the history of an artist, which otherwise is assumed as a mere painting.

Dayanita's lecture at Max Mueller was another interesting one, where she spoke about book making. She spoke about her experiments in laying out books, distribution of books, publishing, and dissemination  in the industry of publishing. Her ideas were great, and no doubt that she is a good artist. But photography, she said was something alien to her. She had actually went to study typography at NID. She ended up taking photograpy due to some strange reason where she felt she could express better through that medium. There was no stress on the act of taking a picture or photography in her entire lecture. I wondered if she actually was a photographer. She spoke about how she liked making little booklets, how she liked making books, presenting them in different ways to raise several questions about pulishing and the industry of prints. She shared her experiences with Gerhard, who is supposed to be a great publisher from Germany. However, it was silly when she said that her real place was the 'road', where once her work was displayed in the jeweller's shop front, where beggars, and paan walahs would point to people her work and ironically when she was selling her newest booklet (about 50 pages, vertical half A4) at MMB (without any bills) priced at Rs. 2000/-

Anyway,

l have several questions about artists, the practice of art and about who become artists, rather who should become artists? What separates one artist from another? Is there a relationship between medium that the artist uses and him/herself? Are artists confused people or people who are confident with confusion? In the above cases, I see that they project contradictions. Unfortunately these are encountered only by other artists. I wonder if these contradictions reach people. It's only the artist community which talks about such issues and artists become famous. How do artists become famous otherwise? They receive grants, huge amounts of money, for whatever they want to do - ofcourse once they get famous! Funny isn't it? But I am sure there is more to it. Otherwise who would raise these large questions of gender, identity, body, space, time, place...

I have many such complex issues with my own self. One of these I tried to raise in my thesis. I am not particularly skilled. Artists find a way of representing their contradiction (even thought they might not be skilled). Perhaps that is what is commendable. How does one represent complex issues with the self or the society? Artists bring these difficult or complex experiences together in some form. Can this form be architecture? Can architects be artists? A big debate. However, I am still to start a practice, and still to get a commission to experiment this question.

and for this question,
My father says, 'Life is very long',
and I believe that's the whole problem.

Western Railway

Letters that start with 'unfortunately'....

...and discuss it
---

Dear Anuj,


unfortunately I couldn`t meet you personally this week, please except my Email instead.

As you know already, the Cultural Spaces-project will not be carried forward in the format we had expected, rigtht now it has even come to a stillstand and I do not see that we will carry it further before July/August.

You have been very helpful during the process and even afterwards in assisting us in our regular work with many good ideas and design proposals. Nevertheless I would like to suggest that we stop the work contract at this stage due to the circumstances given in the cultural spaces-context. Moreover our institute will remain closed during the second half of May and there are not many programs in the low season before July/August.

Please let me know whether it would be agreeable to you to end the cooperation with the end of this month. Since ths is very short notice I could also offer to continue till mid May, until we close the institute.

We really enjoyed working with you and you have become a member of the team.We see many opportunities to cooperate in the context of other programs in the near future and would be very happy to stay in touch with you.

Looking forward to hearing from you,

warm regards,

Marla

---

Dear Anuj,

Unfortunately, I am unable to offer you admission to The Master of Architecture II program
of the Irwin S. Chanin School of Architecture program of The Cooper Union.

Our deliberations have been concluded. All of us continue to be impressed by the outstanding academic and creative talents of all our applicants, but we have a very limited number of openings. Generally, we admit less than ten percent of all applicants.

I wish you continued success in the future and especially in your academic career.

Sincerely,

Mitchell L. Lipton
Dean of Admissions and Records
and Registrar

---

Dear Anuj Daga,

We regret to inform you that after careful consideration of your application, the Admissions Committee is unable to offer you admission to the Harvard University Graduate School of Design. We would like to underscore that the Committee is keenly aware that there are many strong candidates whom we are unable to admit. We very much appreciate your interest in the Graduate School of Design and wish you the best in your career pursuits.

Sincerely,

Gail Gustafson and Geri Nederhoff
Directors of Admission

---

I am truly sorry to inform you that we are not offering you admission to MIT in the Department of Architecture. The number of applicants for admission to the Graduate School greatly exceeds the number that can be accommodated and it has been necessary to refuse admission to some fine applicants.

We appreciate your interest in MIT and sincerely hope that you may be able to continue your studies elsewhere.

Sincerely,

Yung Ho Chang
Professor and Department Head
Department of Architecture
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

---

Dear Anuj,

Letters have been mailed out… you should have or will be receiving one most any day.
For those accepted into the program, they were contacted by telephone. We had so many excellent applications this year and unfortunately we could not accept everyone. If you have received an offer from another institution, you may want to consider accepting it.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best,

Dianne WhitmoreDepartment of Architecture
Graduate Field Coordinator
Cornell University