Durer's instrument

Today we did the Durer's Experiment. although i was kind of confident of what result it would produce, it didnot produce really stunning drawings. It was then when Shubhalakshmi told me that Durer too accepted that there were a lot of technical faults in the experiment he did with the grid. I think still, that durer was a lot more technically correct than us. Almost all the students missed the eyehole in their instrument grid they used to draw! So their vision wavered! Some students were concentrating, others were not able to relate to the grid and our object assembly together. But only in a very few drawings, could we actually see converging lines on a cartesian grid.

This was our first theory in practice kind of session where we got a space on a cartesian grid (although people may debate that it would have been even fine to just take any photograph and draw it out on paper). But the point was not that. The point was to perceive a 3D assembly on a flat plane. Hopefully some students will get the point.

I can think of doing a lot of things with this drawing. Sometimes it just gets difficult in communication with students and faculty. Artists think very different from architects. Although they draw in 3D, they think only in 2D. That is what i felt with my colleagues. This is perfectly fine, and I am just wondering how can I use this aspect constructively. We are teaching "perspective drawing" and our definition of perspective is "the way you look" - so you see how broad this subject has become.

We now have to crack some good exercises. Experiments and more fun on the way...