Academy
in a long time hasn’t had the privilege of having a person as renowned as Rasem
Badran. The Jordanian architect was invited to share his thoughts on
architecture for the Annual Lecture at the Academy. In our endeavour to work
towards finding a language to deal with the issues of fast globalization and
changing cultures, Badran’s lecture was appropriately themed ‘Tradition and
Modernity’. It would be worthwhile to reconstruct the summary of the lecture
through the conjunction of the title. ‘And’ signifies the
temporal property of two things happening at the same time in Badran’s
work. This is seen not only in his work, but the representation of his work too.
Two questions that I must raise at the outset are: Does the technique of
representation guide the kind of architecture we make? Can a certain kind of
architecture encourage a specific kind of representation?
Badran
introduced the audience to his background thought process through his sketches
right since his childhood till his thirties. He spoke of his fascination towards
aeroplanes and his interest in photography. Often taking photographs from
aeroplanes (elevated space); he found similar patterns in the vaguest of
things. Grids of houses with lines of buses, city skylines with lipsticks and
cosmetics, reflections of sky in water
with farmlands on ground – all these pairs of images brought out a dialectic of
issues that Badran’s work deals with. This ability of linking up contexts in
different scales was unique of Badran. Further he used these images to
establish his position within ‘and’.
Badran
believes that the hand is the transcendental medium through which one converts
thoughts in the mind to an expression on paper. Therefore hands are the means to
the material manifest of our minds. Drawing is therefore an intrinsic process
towards realization of all his work. Badran’s sketches are rigorous, attempting
to structure a social space through his architecture, which he recorded in his
childhood sketches. Therefore he works towards drawing the essence of this
cultural space into his present work.
One reads in his drawings, dialogues between the past and the present.
His work is familiar, yet new; it recalls the past yet suggests a future...
His
work came across to be extremely urban – one that would only follow a
systematic analysis of the context of the site, linking an architectural
project to the larger dynamic of the city. Drawing axes, movement and sectional
study diagrams, his architecture is an attempt at ‘place’-making. His buildings
seemed like always there, his housing projects were almost civilizations. He
successfully breaks down his monumental programs into smaller portions which
become spaces that are absorbed by the city. His buildings are never
pretentious and never express any desire to stand out. Infact, they blend in
their surroundings often bringing a fresh experience of an otherwise everyday
space. This can be particularly noted in his projects with religious programs.
Towards
the end, Badran shared some of his contemporary works which showed the constant
struggle to balance his ideologies with his next generation of architects,
including that of his own son. He urged the audience to believe in the potential of the
hand over the mind of the computer. This conviction comes across very strongly
through his method of working. The vertical buildings that his office now
handles too show signs of breaking down the monumentality into smaller
fragments – perhaps to achieve a certain territoriality, a feeling of emergence
from the ground. It seems he maintains it through his representation – the non
changing browns of his sketches echo a certain connection to the soil.
Badran
over the next two days interacted with students at Academy over his sketches.
His dialogues through sketches re-established into the young minds, a love for
drawing as well as their own contexts.
No comments:
Post a Comment