Bomb in the Museum

Investigations into the physical manifestation of fear in the city

Post the terror attacks, where on one hand, there is a lot of rage in the pubic mind, there is an induction of tremendous fear on the other. We see the manifestation of the fear in urban environment in the form of increased security booths, check points, CCTVs and upgradation of existing infrastructure.

Bomb is a volatile explosive. It has become a common object of everyday discussion, still maintaining its destructive position. As an object, the bomb remains suspicious and follows no particular schedule to explode in the course of city life. Explosions happen. However, bomb is an explosive only when ignited.  If placed in a museum, a bomb is just an exhibit.

  

The city is a container of objects, people, infrastructure and above all – ideas and memories. It is here when all physical substance in the city becomes exhibit. The city gives a large canvas to all the matter to exist in the backdrop of each other. Therefore, like the museum, the city is a storehouse of myriad objects and activities,  contributing towards memories, histories and events.

Bomb in the Museum thus allows a dual perception of both, the bomb and the museum. The museum is a storehouse of memories, like the city, but also in an explosive state because of the presence of the bomb.

The city’s behaviour to this bomb is aberrant. To some, the bomb invokes, to some, it inspires and to some, the bomb just scares – others just ignore it. Each of such behaviours ultimately results into some kind of explosion – personal or public. These explosions might be diverse in nature and either work towards improvement of the museum/metropolis or destroy/harm the city which may again gear towards improvement. Both these acts are indicators of some physical action in the city, which affect indirectly the city’s functioning, the city’s perception and its behaviour.

The museum’s behaviour towards the visitor is important because that may also lead towards the creation of a ‘bomb’/the exhibit. Thus user in turn defines a space for the artifact – the bomb, through the nature of their movement around the exhibit.  This space is either repellent or attractive, it creates its own domain. Thus the exhibit controls the actions of the visitors in the museum, and the visitors remain in disguise about the fact that the bomb is their own creation. 

How do people’s thoughts become the ingredient of supplanting a bomb?

e.g.: Statue of Thakerey’s wife at Shivaji Park is a bomb as well as an exhibit in the city. It creates its own space and own behavioural pattern.

An investigation into which spaces are used for realizing and placing such bombs: What tension such spaces exist in and what is the nature of a volatile space? How does a bomb, which is an exhibit first has the potential to explode the museum itself?

(another obscure fragmented idea developed during 2009)
seems like the right time to publish it here!